Make a time lapse video with your iPhone

April 20th, 2010 by James


This weekend I was showing my daughter time lapse videos of sunflowers (using the YouTube player on my iPhone), and she wanted to know how they were made. So, since I hadn’t yet tried out my iPhone tripod mount that I picked up on eBay (yay China), nor my iTimeLapse Pro software, we gave it a go and this is what we came up with.

It’s a lot of fun to do if you have the time, and I’m sure there are a lot of other subjects better suited to the process.

This one is my daughter reading from a book of animals on a lazy Sunday morning.


Axis of Awesome – All songs have the same 4 chords

April 20th, 2010 by James

A very enjoyable way to spend a few minutes.


Stephen Wiltshire draws Sydney

April 17th, 2010 by James

I’m looking forward to going into the city this week – the city being Sydney in my particular case. I’m especially looking forward to it because internationally acclaimed artist and autistic savant Stephen Wiltshire will be drawing a cityscape of Sydney all week long at Customs House. I’ll drop by on Wednesday when he’ll presumably be halfway done.

For those of you who don’t know who he is, you’re in for some amazement. Stephen, who is from the UK, is an artist who creates drawings and paintings of detailed cityscapes and other subjects such as classic American cars. His accurate representations of cities are sometimes drawn from memory after having only observed them briefly – when I viewed the documentary on his website that details how he created his cityscape of Tokyo (where I lived for about 10 years in total), I was blown away at the end result given the amount of time he had to view his subject and the detail that went into it. He has done many similar works, including London, Rome, Hong Kong, Moscow, Dubai and New York among others, sometimes from multiple vantage points.

His in-place scenes are equally compelling, and one marvels at how his mind is able to work. It makes me wonder how many other people there are like him with abilities equally beyond the comprehension of mortals – and what humans in general are capable of. I think it is a testament to generosity of the artist that he shares both his creations and the act of creating with the world around him.

If anyone else is up for some pure wonder, see you on Wednesday.


Buy a Cannondale OnBike

April 16th, 2010 by James

Go ahead, buy one if you can. The Cannondale OnBike is one of the cleanest designs ever seen, with no chain to be seen (or soil your cream linen summer suit when you ride to the park with your picnic basket, resplendent with ascot and boater hat). It also has the cables tucked neatly inside the frame.

Like previous models with a single front fork, the asymmetric frame makes it stand out visually, but this frame goes a step further as you can see. I’ve owned Cannondale before, and the quality of their bikes are superb. Mine was a beautiful chrome frame mountain bike that I sold to a bond trader in Tokyo before moving to Canada. I miss it dearly.

At over US$6K if you can find one that fits, it’s not for everyone. But with any luck the Chinese will soon be knocking out a whole fleet of Huffy bikes in the same design, and I’ll be able to pick one up at Kmart for $199.


Prices in Australia

April 14th, 2010 by James

I remember going to my first ’sale’ in Australia. People had lined up to get in, because as recently as 10 years ago, there was only one sale a year and it happened at the end of the year. At the time, Levis sold for about 25 bucks in the US – they were $100 here, and during the sale they were ‘heavily discounted’ 20% to a mere $80.


Over the years I’ve had many conversations online and in person regarding prices in Australia. Most people here seem to believe the much higher prices are due to a combination of geographic isolation, small population, and shipping costs. I think there is a lot more to it.

First of all I must say that people here don’t like hearing any kind of criticism – even if they agree that prices are too high, they don’t like hearing it from a ‘foreigner’. The consensus is if you don’t like it, go home. I find that attitude in itself odd enough – but nowhere near as odd as how easily people swallow the excuses for exorbitant price gouging in the country.

To give an example that illustrates the root of the problem, think about the price surge in bananas here following a bad storm season that supposedly “wiped out” banana production in the north. Bananas were as expensive as $10/kg following this event in 2006. Although production didn’t take 4 years to recover, retail prices did. Sure it didn’t stay at $10 for long, but when the Coles-Woolworths monopoly figured out that people would gladly pay $4-$5 per kilo, why sell at the old price of $1-$2 per kilo? As I’ve told people, bananas cost less in frozen Canada than they do here, and I can guarantee that nobody in Nova Scotia is growing them. They come by ship from the Caribbean. The bottom line is that retailers charge what they think people will pay, and only lower the price when they have a surplus to unload.

The keenest example is perhaps the retail clothing industry. You can’t really explain why Levis are double or triple or quadruple the price here, especially since they are shipped here from China just like the Levis that hit Wal-Mart in the US. Sure Wal-Mart buys more of them, but Australia still buys enough volume of products like Levis that the price differential should only be 5-10%. Why is an Adidas t-shirt $40 here when I can buy one in the US for $15? And on and on. Retail clothing maintains this high price because it can – people don’t want to buy clothes online because they want to try them on, touch them, see them, and easily return them. A basic casual shirt here with buttons and a collar – of a brand never heard of outside Australia – easily sells for $60 – $100 in mall shops. Even Target and Kmart charge at least double. Same for bed sheets and a lot of other items.

Consumer electronics on the other hand are often about the same price, although some things still command a premium, and bricks and mortar retailers advertise “insanely cheap” prices that are often 25% more than the same product sold from an online Aussie retailer. Given the differences in voltage etc. it’s unlikely that much outside of computers (which have universal power supplies) will be big out of country online buys anytime soon.

One thing is certain: if you want prices to drop, you have to spend your money elsewhere, even out of the country, until the local retailers are forced to compete. And that is probably true anywhere.

Or you could simply convince yourself that buying true-blue is a good enough reason to pay double.


The iPad and the future of books

April 12th, 2010 by James

Paul Carr has an interesting perspective on why the iPad will successfully kill the Kindle – but in his words, ‘for all the wrong reasons’. He’s right about a few things. First of all, the Kindle is doomed, because no matter how good e-ink might be, most technology consumers are not going to buy a single-use device. One might say the Kindle needs little help in killing itself.

And for all those iPad reviewers who say “I read online all day, so it won’t make my eyes tired” – he’s spot on when he calls them out, as reading a few articles is not the same as reading a book for an extended period of time. So it’s probably true that the iPad will be just as crappy at being an e-book reader as any laptop – and that’s probably why you don’t bother reading books on your laptop today.

Where he’s wrong is his conclusion – that the iPad will kill the Kindle, and along with that it will kill ‘the experience of reading for pleasure’. Sure there will be people who might spend their train commute reading online content or lighter reading, such as magazines and newspapers, instead of books. This might be a good thing for those who sell magazines and newspapers. But people will still read books. Real books.

Remember the twenty and thirty-somethings who told us bricks and mortar were dead, and that everything would soon be online? Then the dot com boom imploded and they all went back to normal jobs, smug grins tucked neatly into their khaki trousers, convertible BMWs traded in for Honda Accords. The only good thing that came of the dot com boom was the permanent introduction of the business casual dress code in the US. It still hasn’t caught on here in Australia. And remember all the old suits who said they would simply wait for the dot com boom to implode, then go back to doing what they always did? Well they were sort of right, but then they went on to create the GFC. Way to go boys.

But the truth is that neither were totally right. What came about was a world where many more products and services were now available online (Australia is still years behind, mind you), but bricks and mortar didn’t go away. In fact, the internet forced traditional businesses to become more customer friendly in some ways (who remembers when banks were only open 10am to 3pm – now they have branches in grocery stores and stay open on weekends) and less friendly in others (when was the last time you called a toll free customer service number and spoke to Heidi in Chennai?). It changed the world, but it didn’t really kill anything.

Back to the books. People read books because they like books, and most book readers couldn’t give a damn about the Kindle or the iPad. Hardcover fluff fiction aside, it’s no big deal to throw a paperback in your carry-on in addition to your laptop. In fact, most business people I know now don’t even bother to bring a laptop on a short business trip – they just bring their Blackberry, and a book.

If I had an iPad, I’d probably look at getting a wireless keyboard, and bring it with me to take the place of a laptop, because I believe it offers a better, more ergonomic entertainment experience than a laptop and still allows one to do the basics of what a laptop allows. I would probably consume a lot more magazine and news content if I had an iPad – and I believe the iPad will revolutionise this segment of the publishing industry. If for no other reason, I just hate the waste of throwing magazines and newspapers away after reading them.

But on a trip, I would still bring a book, because nothing yet can really take the place of turning off the devices and cracking open the spine of a fine novel.

You read it here first, the paper book is safe, for now.


Amusing way to learn history

April 11th, 2010 by James


Drunk History – getting historians really drunk and filming them while they gush with passion about their subject (while actors, sometimes actual celebrities, act out the scenes in a silent video), is pure genius. I know it is more than a bit puerile, but I find this series the most entertaining way to learn snippets of casual history. It certainly beats reading another review of iPhone OS 4.0, and is perhaps even better than high res photos of a a DIY iPad case made from duct tape.

Please don’t try this at home, you’ll look like a guest at one of my dinner parties.

Which brings up another topic related to history. I was having a conversation with a friend over beers and coffee the other night (very civilised way to spend an evening I might add, especially with a suitably comely lass singing live at the bar with acoustic guitar backup) – and we were talking about why the iPad would (him) or wouldn’t fail (me). The tangent took us to social networking, and he talked about why he didn’t have a Facebook page – it doesn’t interest him to start with, but mostly he is surprised at how willingly Gen-Y and younger FBers willingly allow the creation of a permanent digital record of many things that could prove embarrassing or career limiting in the future.

The Drunk History professors will no doubt one day be the pillars of our universities, high schools, and perhaps communities. Will this come back to haunt them? I doubt it. Lighten up and laugh, I say. By the time the kids on FB get to the point that the content could embarrass them, everyone but smug prudes will have a similar track record online. The only two possible outcomes of this will be:

1. People will lighten up and laugh at this stuff.
2. People will start to behave. Unlikely.

So go ahead and make an ass of yourself online. It won’t matter. And at least one person will be laughing.


The iPad is Dr. Theopolis

April 8th, 2010 by James

Brian Lam’s interesting iPad review shows how practical (and geeky) the iPad can be, and believe he’s only scratching the surface.

But in reading it, I couldn’t help but think that his iPad is really just a now version of the venerable Dr. Theopolis from the old Buck Rogers series. Which I suppose makes Brian a new kind of Twiki.

Ah the good old days – when there were only two channels on TV and no computers (aside from my Vic20, which used the TV as a monitor) to distract me from this kind of stuff.

Quote from slipperybrick.com regarding the pair:

Twiki & Dr. Theopolis-From the show Buck Rogers in the 25th Century. Twiki is the robot, while Dr. Theopolis is another robot carried on Twiki’s chest like bling. Mel Blanc provided the voice for the character in most episodes and Twiki’s voice is a cross between two of his characters from Merrie Melodies, Yosemite Sam and Porky Pig.


Sales – People or Process?

April 6th, 2010 by James

Interesting Article on the use of process in sales.


The iPad will not fail

April 5th, 2010 by James

That is my prediction.


And I gotta tell you, I’m getting a bit tired of all the gushing and bashing. Never before have so many written so much about so little for so long. And now I’m doing it too.

But what I have to say is not really about the iPad per se. I have no plans to buy one, although I might if I was single, or if I didn’t already convince my wife that I needed an iMac, an iPhone, and a MacBook Pro in the stretch of 2 years. OK I definitely would if I could get away with it. And I’d be thrilled if someone sent one to me. It does pain me to see people bash them on YouTube with golf clubs and baseball bats. I don’t get those people. But I digress.

I’m one of those for whom the allure of Facebook has already worn completely off. I thought Twitter was dumb when I first heard of it, then I thought I saw prospects, then I thought it was dumb again. I still hardly use it – but twitter, and tweeters, frankly don’t give a rat’s ass whether I think it is dumb or not. People just go on and use it, because for many it is a great way to connect and share. What I loved about twitter in the middle of the affair was the ability to connect with people who shared my interest in say, Sam Beam, without having to join an Iron & Wine online community and wax endlessly about when his next album might come out.

Yet I love to surf. I love to use the internet experience to kill time, to discover new music, to satisfy my curiosity about something on Wikipedia or IMDB. I love to find out there are lots of other people who think the name Lady Gaga is dumb enough to be the sole reason I refuse to listen to even one of her songs, and their words give me comfort that I have not missed much.

I spend a lot of time at my iMac. Taking it out of the box and setting it up was the first Christmas-like magic I had in years – it’s beautiful, it works, it doesn’t come with 34 ‘free’ trial versions of software, it doesn’t endlessly tell me there is a Java update available. It just submits to use.

My iMac sits in my office, where I do this stuff, and surf, and I keep in touch with family and friends on Skype. But one tires of sitting in the office all the time. That’s what I loved about the iPhone. I had a HTC smartphone prior to that, and it was cool, but Windows Mobile really sucked and it just didn’t ‘work’ the way it should. It wasn’t a great experience, kind of like an XP laptop. Dull. The iPhone worked, and if you could think of something you’d like to do with it, there was probably already an app or 9 for the task. It enabled me to indulge my new passion for Google Reader anywhere. I liked that. Like my Vic20 so many years ago, it did a bunch of things I didn’t need to do, or which I could already do with a pen, paper, and a cheap Nokia mobile phone.

So recently I got a MacBook Pro using some dubious logic about why I needed one…and I love it, but I haven’t used it much yet. It’s a perfect device in its class – but the ergonomics of carrying a 15″ laptop around the house or keeping it nearby to satisfy the whims of my knowledge gaps simply aren’t right. That’s where I think the iPad would work. Perhaps I need to get out more.

With the iPad though, most of all, I know it will work. I know there will be great apps for it. I know there will be great content for it, for example, it will excel as a way to consume magazine content. I love magazines. New applications (as opposed to apps) will find the iPad. And everyone else will just try to keep up, instead of innovating. It’s kind of funny, since tablet PCs have been around and failed for so long, that Apple was able to sell 700,000 of these things in a week. Tablet PCs were a choice between a laptop and a tablet – with more moving parts, unproven clunky technology that might or might not work, features you didn’t need. The iPad is not trying to be that. It’s the Jesper Parnevik of tablets – argyle capri pants and all. It’s the device you buy in addition to your other stuff. It’s a break from the same old. You still don’t need one. Need is hardly the point.

That’s where it is kind of like Starbucks – the iPad not just a device, it’s a lifestyle, an identity, an experience. A loser with an iPad becomes a smug loser, and probably takes their new iPad to Starbucks every chance they get. You could argue Starbucks is just a coffee shop, but the masses still go there. You can argue the technological superiority of some other device over the iPad, or the value argument, or the fact that Apple isn’t the underdog anymore. But nobody will care.

The iPad certainly won’t.


Custom Search